Wednesday, June 5, 2013

A Conversation: Sara Wintz and Megan Breiseth

Sara Wintz and Megan Breiseth 
share a witty and entertaining Q & A

Come hear them read with fellow poet Grace Marie Grafton on Friday, June 7th @ 7:30 PM!

 
Looking for summer reading suggestions?


Megan Breiseth answering questions from Sara Wintz

If you had to only keep five books on your bookshelf what would they be?

O dear!  Okay.  Changing Light at Sandover, Infinite Jest, Selected Stein, Collected Spicer, OED

What on earth, other than writers, influences your writing?

My body, how it's experiencing things.  Divination processes, like tarot and automatic writing.  Movies.  Music.  The scenery.

What's your sign?

Libra.  Fire snake.  High Priestess.  Eleven.

Where did you grow up?

In an unincorporated area between a couple suburbs of Chicago.  Amid all that's the worst about suburbia, but in a hidden farm garden paradise.

What's it like to be a mom?

Easier and harder than I expected.  I'm such a rookie still but have noticed some things.  

  • New fears and vivid imagination about possible ways the babe could come to harm.  There are so many!  
  • Crazy relationship to time.  Some hours sneak right past me, others are an eternity in which a thousand things happen.  
  • Microscopic attention that makes most experiences feel new as we imagine how he's experiencing them.  Leading to random attacks of crazy bliss.
  • Microscopic attention that makes every decision feel bigger than it did before when just deciding for myself. Leading to slight obsessiveness.
  • Exhausting.  


How did your first book change your life?

The first books read to me were old poets like coleridge, wordsworth, and dickinson.  I was an insomniac baby and my mom treated me to endless hours of poetry.

The first books I read gave me a world of my own, a place to go and be alone and not alone at the same time.  Perfect blend of comfort and excitement.

The first book I wrote taught me that even though I feel like an impossibly slow writer who never writes, I actually do write and can finish something if I work really hard.

What's your daily routine?

Right now, it's something like this: wake up at 6am to feed James.  Get back in bed til 9.  Feed James while reading.  Get him dressed, feed myself, play around with him.  Maybe go for a walk.  James's lunchtime nap (sometimes)- do chores, maybe yoga class if wife is around.  Feed baby.  Afternoon walk- to coffee or grocery or library or beach.  James's afternoon nap (sometimes)- read or garden or chores.  Feed baby.  Dinner with wife.  Baby bath.  Baby massage.  Baby reading, nursing, sleep by like 930.  Watch movie or read, maybe even shower.  Adults go to bed around 10, 11, 12.  
Soon I'll go back to work and this will all be different.  Notice nowhere the word "write."  Will be working on that.

What's your favorite book store in the east bay?

I'm especially fond of Walden Pond Books on Grand.

Tea or coffee and what kind?

Peet's decaf coffee with milk.

Sara Wintz answering questions from Megan Breiseth

What's a book that you remember fondly from childhood? 

Bunnicula! 

What do you remember about it? 

Well, Bunnicula is the story of a vampire-bunny rabbit that sucks the blood out of vegetables, obviously. My brother and I listened to it on tape and there was one part where a character said, "You stupid owl!" and that always cracked us up when we heard it, because it was such a silly exclamation. I still love that book. If I ever get a tattoo I'm totally getting "Bunnicula" emblazened across my collarbone. 

When do you write? 

Later in the day: in the afternoon or in the evening usually. 

Where do you write? 

Oh all over. This week I keep thinking about lines to incorporate into poems, while I'm "on the go" or out with friends. I've been saving the notes on my phone as text message drafts. Sometimes i write in bed before I go to sleep, sometimes on my computer at my desk.  

What's going to be your favorite part of the revolution? 

The part when everyone starts to farm together and grow food all over the place for everyone in the neighborhood to share. 

What's the coolest activism you've seen lately? 

Occupy the Farm and People's Libraries, and everything that's happening in Turkey of course. 

What would you like to invent? 

An invisibility cloak! 

What's the strangest vehicle you've travelled in? 

Hm. I think that a Uhaul is the strangest vehicle I've ever driven.

What advice do you most often give to others? 

Don't compare to others, focus on being yourself. 






Megan Breiseth comes from Illinois and has lived in the Bay Area for 13 years. She’s the author of the chapbook Zia and the manuscript Fur. In addition to writing poetry, she also teaches, coaches, and reads tarot cards.









Sara Wintz’s work brings together text and theater in a practice that encompasses research, poetry, and performance. Ugly Duckling Presse published her book about the twentieth century, WALKING ACROSS A FIELD WE ARE FOCUSED ON AT THIS TIME NOW, in December 2012.  

Sara Wintz is a contributing editor of Ugly Duckling Presse’s annual performance art sourcebook, EMERGENCY INDEX, and a member of the Board of Directors for Small Press Traffic, a literary arts non-profit based in San Francisco. She is a recipient of a grant from the Fund for Poetry, and a graduate of Mills College and the Milton Avery School of Graduate Studies at Bard College. 
Her writing is published in JacketThe Poetry Project Newsletter6x6Big Bell, Openned,Try!HTML Giant, and in the anthology The Sonnets: Re-Writing Shakespeare (recently published by Telephone/Nightboat Books). She lives in Oakland.



Friday, May 17, 2013

Friday, June 7th @ 7:30pm with Sara Wintz, Megan Breiseth, and Grace Marie Grafton

Join us on Friday, June 7th for readings by
Sara Wintz, Megan Breiseth and Grace Marie Grafton! 

Event begins at 7:30pm
Beverages and snacks will be served

With host Bryn Lee Garrehy

We hope to see you there!

+ Come early for Bites Off Broadway: amazing food outside on the Studio One Lawn, 5:30-8:30pm 


 
Sara Wintz’s work brings together text and theater in a practice that encompasses research, poetry, and performance. Ugly Duckling Presse published her book about the twentieth century, WALKING ACROSS A FIELD WE ARE FOCUSED ON AT THIS TIME NOW, in December 2012.  

 Sara Wintz is a contributing editor of Ugly Duckling Presse’s annual performance art sourcebook, EMERGENCY INDEX, and a member of the Board of Directors for Small Press Traffic, a literary arts non-profit based in San Francisco. She is a recipient of a grant from the Fund for Poetry, and a graduate of Mills College and the Milton Avery School of Graduate Studies at Bard College. 

Her writing is published in JacketThe Poetry Project Newsletter6x6Big Bell, Openned, Try!HTML Giant, and in the anthology The Sonnets: Re-Writing Shakespeare (recently published by Telephone/Nightboat Books). She lives in Oakland.



 

Megan Breiseth comes from Illinois and has lived in the Bay Area for 13 years. She’s the author of the chapbook Zia and the manuscript Fur. In addition to writing poetry, she also teaches, coaches, and reads tarot cards.






Grace Marie Grafton’s newest book, Whimsy, Reticence and Laud/unruly sonnets, came out in Spring 2012 from Poetic Matrix Press (www.poeticmatrix.com).   Her book of prose poems, Other Clues, 2010, was published by Latitude Press (rawartpress.com).  A chapbook of wordplay poems, Chrysanthemum Oratorio, 2010, is available from Dancing Girl Press. 



She has worked for many years with CA Poets In The Schools, teaching children to write poetry.  For her teaching work, she received numerous CA Arts Council grants, as well as being named Teacher of the Year by the River Of Words youth poetry and art annual contest, co-sponsored by Robert Hass, US Poet Laureate.



Her poetry won first prize in the Soul Making contest (PEN women, San Francisco), in the annual Bellingham Review contest, and Honorable Mention from Anderbo and Sycamore Review.  Poems recently appear in Anderbo, Ambush Review, Talking Writing, Theodate and The Offending Adam.          




Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Friday, May 3rd: Studio One and Quiet Lightning Collaboration, feat. erica lewis and Adeena Karasick

Studio One and Quiet Lightning present: Studio Lightning/ Quiet Studio/ One Lightning! 

Featuring the work of erica lewis and Adeena Karasick 
+ many others! 

Show curators: Nicole McFeely and Janey Smith


Doors @ 7:00 PM; Show @ 7:30 

Snacks and FREE Lagunitas Beer will be served 
(donations accepted)



Featured Reader bios:



erica lewis lives in San Francisco where she is a fine arts publicist and ran the Canessa Reading Series. A graduate of Northwestern University and Mills College (where she was the recipient of the 2008 Mary Merritt Henry Prize for poetry), her work has appeared in various journals and anthologies. Books include murmur in the inventory (Shearsman Books, January 2013), the precipice of jupiter (Queue Books), and camera obscura (BlazeVox Books); the latter two books are collaborations with artist Mark Stephen Finein. She was born in Cincinnati, Ohio.
  


Adeena Karasick is a poet, media-artist and author of seven books of poetry and poetic theory: Most recently,This Poem (Talonbooks 2012), which opened on the McNally Best Seller list and voted top 5 books of 2012, All her work is marked with a neo-fluxus, post Flarffian conceptualist, urban, Jewish, feminist aesthetic that continually challenges linguistic habits and normative modes of meaning production. Engaged with the art of combination and turbulence of thought, it is a testament to the creative and regenerative power of language and its infinite possibilities for pushing meaning to the limits of its semantic boundaries. Her writing has been described as "electricity in language" (Nicole Brossard), "plural, cascading, exuberant in its cross-fertilization of punning and knowing, theatre and theory" (Charles Bernstein) "a tour de force of linguistic doublespeak" (Globe and Mail) and "opens up the possibilities of reading" (Vancouver Courier).  She is Professor of Pop culture  and Media Theory at Fordham University in New York.


Wednesday, April 3, 2013

A Conversation: Michael Zapruder and Sheila Davies Sumner


Michael Zapruder and Sheila Davies Sumner discuss 
the musical illustration of poems




I think that without the chorus-like parts of the record, the sense that this is an effort to pull songs into the world of poetry would have failed, and it would have seemed much more like a collection of experimental poetry, as opposed to a record of experimental, yet very songlike, songs.

 - Michael Zapruder


Sheila Davies Sumner: You began by listening to poets read, collaborating with your “inner ear’s inner ear” to hear the songs within poems. Six years later, you’ve recorded twenty-two songs on a CD that accompanies your project, Pink Thunder, which turns these poems into song. You write, “my inviolable rule was that the poems must control the music and not vice versa”. This sounds very hard to do, to sing these poems as closely as possible to a typical reading –– almost like translating. How did you keep from you from going astray? What signs were there that held you to this disciplined, controlled path? 

Michael Zapruder: There really weren't any signs that held me to a path. I think the songs would have turned out pretty badly if I had held any certain expectations or even if I had been looking beyond myself and my intuition that the poems were a) not being destroyed by the music and b) that the music was still songlike.

The poems probably don't control the music as much as they guide it. I have a hunch that neither poetry nor music is likely to work well if the process is overly controlled by some outside force. 

SDS: Your voice can sound a whole bunch of ways –– tuneful and tuneless, hard and surrendering, with sweet notes and tender breaks in tone (see some examples below). I’m curious about the decisions you have to make about a poem to establish the voice or voices of a song –– the who who sings.

Lonely:                         None of this matters to you anymore  (James Tate, “From an Island”)

Earnest:                       These boobs are real  (Dorothea Lasky, “Boobs Are Real”)

Yearning:                      Songs of the past noelle  (Matthew Zapruder, "Opera")

Gentle:                         She has a dream and she has the same dream (Bob Hicok, “Twins”)

Soft introspection:        Unsoothes you where you slip (Hoa Nguyen, “Calmly Grass
                                     Becomes a Wave”)

Clarity:                          I was the smallest thing in the world / fragment of spit, rumor of mud 
                                     (Dara Wier, “For a Chinese Poet Writing Through the Night Up on
                                      Mt. Pollux”) 

MZ: This is a great question. Recording these vocals was, as I think I mention in the Introduction to the book, very confusing, since the poems seem to speak from such an ambiguous place. There isn't always the strong sense of self or clear emotional tone as you find it in songs. Maybe it's something to do with the fact that you can't really sing to yourself (in your head, at least), whereas if you're reading poetry, the kind of language in these poems is not that different from what you might think to yourself at any given time.

It might also have to do with the idea that these poems are usually read aloud in a certain environment—one that is almost like a ritual space. Music can create that kind of space, but then words seem to dilute that effect by engaging the thinking mind.

In any case, these words, combined with music and the fact that I had to sing them, didn't always seem like they needed to be sung. And of course they didn't, since they were already fully functional poems. 

SDS: Some poems are litany-like or have the equivalent of refrains. I’m curious how you develop or compose through these. For instance, in Dorothea Lasky’s poem: “They stole, They knocked, They killed, They cut, They pierced, They ran, They played, They loved, They gave.” Did these repetitions facilitate or obstruct the songwriting? Did you resist or welcome them? 

MZ: I don't think I resisted anything, partly because I only worked on poems that, from the start, seemed to be likely to lead to songs fairly easily. Things like the repetitions in Dottie's poem actually provide a more familiar foundation for being songlike, since song has such a copacetic relationship with repetition. It's easier to sing lines like the ones you mention above than it is to sing line after line with no obvious common characteristics. Eventually, dissimilarities that come one after another in a song will break the listener's trust that this is in fact a song. The piece might be amazing, but it becomes something else. 

SDS:  In your Artists’s Statement you make the observation, “Ultimately I came to think that the music of a poem is like a mobile,” which confirmed as well as influenced my listening experience. Your music does take on different shapes, which is part of its pleasure. These songs feel constructed to showcase equilibrium: rods as music, weighted objects as words –– in sculpted motion, in stillness, in balance.

Many songs make use of the chorus in this compensatory way. For instance, the swelling chorus sound in “Florida” by Travis Nichols; the choral distance in “Last Words” by Sierra Nelson, or the remote hari-krishnas in “Book of Life” by Noelle Kocot; and those lovely, soothing harmonies in “Chia Pet Cemetery” by D.A. Powell, in “Civics” by David Berman, and in “Word” by Joe Wenderoth. Would you talk about the role of chorus in your translations of a poem into a song? 

MZ: Great question. One of the real dangers of these songs is that they just end up seeming like a bunch of random ideas strung together. I was always on the lookout for any opportunity to drop into a chorus or a repetitive cycle, to balance out the free-verse sections. I also wanted to believe that the poems do have refrains in them, even if they are extremely subtle.

I think that without the chorus-like parts of the record, the sense that this is an effort to pull songs into the world of poetry would have failed, and it would have seemed much more like a collection of experimental poetry, as opposed to a record of experimental, yet very songlike, songs. 

SDS: You sing the poems “with music happening.” Which turns out to be a rich selection and inventive use of strings, horns, percussion, synthesizers –– aural spices. And the musical structure is complex. One example is “My Grandmother” by Valzhyna Mort (translated by Mort & Franz Wright). More than halfway through the poem, at the line, Her arms like stork legs, the song seems to unfold into an altogether new genre –– a torch song, to my ear. Is this what you mean by “deep verses”? 

MZ: Actually, no. To me, that's one of the best examples of a chorus that seemed to emerge from the poem. After a number of through-composed, non-repeating lines, suddenly the song finds itself in a big refrain. Bob Hicok's "Twins" is a better example, where, after a refrain-like section in the middle, the music has to support quite a bit more text, and it does so with new musical ideas.

Any new idea, or a variation of an idea, that appears for the first time late in a song can weaken the sense that a piece of music is in fact a song. I don't know if this is some fundamental law of song or if it's a convention, but most of us expect songs to introduce most of their ideas by somewhere close to the midpoint. There are exceptions, but I think they prove the rule. 

SDS: “Birdman” by Gillian Conoley, is spare and off-key, with percussively-appointed sounds. And “Storm Window”, by Mary Ruefle, is so nursery-school bright, with its emphatic, happy rhythms. I love this particular segue or pairing of songs –– we slide off Now I am a yellow hammer and jump into She sat writing little poems of mist. What in these poems inspired such disparate types of music? 

MZ: Well thank you! It's funny, Birdman was one of the first of these songs that I wrote, and Storm Window was one of the last. And it wasn't the poems that inspired the different types of music, so much as the music that inspired the different kinds of poems. Basically, when I did Storm Window, I picked it in part because I needed something faster and brighter to balance the overall group of songs. That's such a vivid poem, it's so easy to see the whole situation, that I think it would be possible to write a very good slow song based on it, as well. 

SDS: New meters and line breaks are created in the way particular words and phrases are vocally or musically stressed. Words like Heavyassedness (Carrie St. George Comer), Occupant glow (Joshua Beckman), and Opera (Mathew Zapruder). And phrases like Along the way to civilization (Tyehimba Jess) with its crescendo, or She wore it to the opera (St. George Comer again, from At Play in My Garden on a Sunday Morning”) with its high frequency EQ. This placement of the emotional charge seems to give some songs a playful feel of improvisation, even after many listenings. 

MZ: I'm very glad to hear that! 

SDS: The book, Pink Thunder, has drawings by Arrington de Dionyso that support the text in an engaging, honest way. The poems are hand-lettered, instead of being typed, changing in thickness and color and size. Overall, there’s a direct mark approach. What was behind this approach or the decision to not type the text? Was that part of the book-design influenced by the way you sing the poems? 

MZ: The idea to have the poems hand-lettered instead of typeset came from the basic understanding that Pink Thunder is not really a poetry anthology, so much as it is a set of "musically-illustrated" poems. Each of the songs really ended up representing a kind of very specific reading of the poem, and the music made those readings very colorful, textured, and limited, but in a strong way, I think. The music eliminates a great deal of ambiguity from the poem, since each tone is either warm or cold, smooth or not, familiar or unfamiliar, and so on. Sounds seem to create visceral reactions that are connected with emotions or meanings, and the sounds on the record do that. So having the poems hand-lettered has a basic resonance with that aspect of the songs. Also, it just looks so amazing and Arrington did such a fantastic job! 

SDS:  Your comments on silence in the Statement are also provocative. You say that within the infinite potential of silence, poets can achieve the most accurate communication, and that the “music of Pink Thunder aspires to, but never fully achieves the condition of silence.” How did this thinking contribute to your song writing? 

MZ: I kind of talked about this in my answer to your question about the book design and why the poems were illustrated. The abstract architecture - and just plain old texture - of music is paradoxically specific. Weirdly, although it has no literal meaning, music creates meanings for listeners that are probably most notable for how specific they feel. When I say that the music in Pink Thunder aspires to the condition of silence, I mean that I wanted it to have as much potential to mean things to listeners as silence has. 

SDS: What are you working on right now? If any, what is the impact of Pink Thunder on new work? 

MZ: I'm composing a lot of instrumental music, I'm well into working on a new record of my own songs, and I'm beginning to read poems for another volume of songs like the ones on Pink Thunder. I also made a version of Pink Thunder as an art exhibit of music-playing found object pieces, and I'm interested in that format for releasing new works both by me and by other artists, as well.

The poems that I was fortunate enough to be able to use for this project were so strong and durable, and they produced songs that are funny, poignant, but above all surprising, that it's definitely made me question everything about the kinds of songs I want to make. On one hand, I plan to continue to investigate these new directions in songs. On the other, I'm also excited to investigate the most basic and traditional song forms, as well. I'd like to write some songs that work well without asking the listeners to do any work to understand the music. 




Michael Zapruder is an award-winning songwriter and recording artist, and a co-founder of San Francisco's Howells Transmitter arts collective and record label. His albums include 52 Songs, This is a Beautiful Town, New Ways of Letting Go, and Dragon Chinese Cocktail Horoscope, which won a 2009 Independent Music Award for Best Folk / Singer Song-Writer Album. His most recent work is Pink Thunder, a collection of free verse pop art-songs made from the poems of more than twenty contemporary American poets. Contributors include Noelle Kocot, James Tate, Bob Hicok, David Berman, D. A. Powell, and Valzhyna Mort. michaelzapruder.com



Sheila Davies Sumner has an M.F.A. in Poetry from St. Mary’s College of California. She has also written short stories which appeared in Rampike, Alcatraz 3, and in the graphic-story magazine, one of one, published by Burning Books. In addition, she has written and produced radio dramas, commissioned by New American Radio, including What is the Matter in Amy Glennon, which was nominated for the International Prix Futura Award.







Friday, March 29, 2013

Friday, April 5th @ 7:30 PM with Matthew Zapruder, Gillian Conoley, Jason Bayani, and music by Michael Zapruder

Join us on Friday, April 5th for a reading with Matthew Zapruder, Gillian Conoley, and Jason Bayani. Plus music by Michael Zapruder from his album
 of poems turned to song, Pink Thunder!

Event begins at 7:30 PM.
Beverages and snacks will be served.

We hope to see you there!


Matthew Zapruder is the author of three collections of poetry, most recently Come On All You Ghosts (Copper Canyon 2010), a New York Times Notable Book of the Year. His poems, essays and translations have appeared in many publications, including Tin HouseParis ReviewThe New RepublicThe New YorkerBombSlatePoetry, and The Believer. He has received a Guggenheim Fellowship, a William Carlos Williams Award, a May Sarton Award from the Academy of American Arts and Sciences, and a Lannan Literary Fellowship. He works as an editor for Wave Books, and as of fall 2013 will be a member of the Faculty of the St. Mary's College of California MFA in Creative Writing. His new book of poems, Sun Bear, is forthcoming in 2014. He and his wife, an urban planner, live in Oakland.

Gillian Conoley was born in Austin Texas, where, on its rural outskirts, her father and mother owned and operated a radio station. She is the author of seven collections of poetry, including THE PLOT GENIE, PROFANE HALO, LOVERS IN THE USED WORLD, and TALL STRANGER, a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award. Her work has received the Jerome J. Shestack Poetry Prize from The American Poetry Review, a National Endowment for the Arts grant, and a Fund for Poetry Award, and is widely anthologized, most recently in W.W. Norton’s new Postmodern American Poetry.  A new collection, PEACE, is forthcoming from Omnidawn in spring 2014. Her translations of three Henri Michaux texts, never brought into English before, will also appear next year, with City Lights. Editor and founder of Volt magazine, she is Professor and Poet-in-Residence at Sonoma State University. 

Jason Bayani is a graduate of Saint Mary’s MFA program in Creative Writing. He is a Kundiman fellow and a veteran of the National Poetry Slam scene. His work has been published in Fourteen Hills, Muzzle Magazine, Mascara Review, the National Poetry Slam anthology, Rattapallax, Write Bloody’s classroom anthology, Learn Then Burn, and other publications. He has been on 7 National Poetry Slam teams, he is a National Poetry Slam finalist, and was the 2010 International World Poetry Slam representative for Oakland, California. He is also one of the founding members of the Filipino American Spoken Word troupe, Proletariat Bronze, and has been an organizer for the Asian and Pacific Islander Poetry and Spoken Word Summit. He currently lives in Austin, Texas. His first book "Amulet" is being released by Write Bloody Press in April, 2013.

Michael Zapruder is an award-winning songwriter and recording artist, and a co-founder of San Francisco's Howells Transmitter arts collective and record label. His albums include 52 Songs, This is a Beautiful Town, New Ways of Letting Go, and Dragon Chinese Cocktail Horoscope, which won a 2009 Independent Music Award for Best Folk / Singer Song-Writer Album. His most recent work is Pink Thunder, a collection of free verse pop art-songs made from the poems of more than twenty contemporary American poets. Contributors include Noelle Kocot, James Tate, Bob Hicok, David Berman, D. A. Powell, and Valzhyna Mort. michaelzapruder.com

Friday, March 22, 2013

Studio One Spring Calendar

Friday, May 3rd-- Doors @ 7:00 PM; Show begins @ 7:30 PM
(In the Studio One Auditorium)

Studio Lightning: A Special SF/East Bay Collaboration between Quiet Lightning & Studio One

Featured Readers:
Adeena Karasick
and erica lewis

Friday, June 7th @ 7:30 PM

Featuring:
Sara Wintz
Megan Breiseth
and Grace Grafton

Saturday, March 9, 2013

A Conversation: Joshua Edwards and Sheila Davies Sumner

Joshua Edward's new book, Imperial Nostalgias, is out from Ugly Duckling Presse this month 
He will be reading at Studio One on March 21st @ 7:30 with Farnoosh Fathi 


"At times, a poem arrives when language pushes back against the self."
-Joshua Edwards



Sheila Davies Sumner: Your new book of poems has an arresting title –– Imperial Nostalgias. Both words have an ineffable quality and taken together that quality is increased tenfold.  It seems that any of our senses can be metabolized into homesickness, remembrance, melancholia –– or into the absence of “the bright feeling of belonging.” The word imperial has a second meaning, it’s a synonym for non-metric, for standard weights and measure. Thus, I found myself wondering about the mass and action of nostalgia in your book, particularly in the title poem. What were your reasons for choosing this title? Also, in your acknowledgements you write that the title is based on a series of poems by the Peruvian poet César Vallejo. Can you say what in your work resonates with or is inspired by Vallejo’s?

Joshua Edwards: First off, since I’ve had the chance to read some of your questions in advance, I just want to say I really appreciate your insightful, considerate reading of the book. I’m so glad you find the title arresting, and I’m pretty sure I chose it as a title for the book before I wrote the eponymous poem. I stole Vallejo’s phrase for a few reasons. First of all, I like its sound and tension (especially since “imperial” translates so unfortunately well into contemporary American English)—it’s ineffable and heavy, imposing and deflated. Secondly, I love Vallejo’s writing and I wanted to reference his itinerancy, poetry, and legend. Although I wouldn’t single him out as a particular influence for this collection—which was written over the course of many years and came together as poems gradually found each other—his agitated lyricism, dark imagery, and use of form and archaic language have definitely shaped my work. Finally, I wanted to create a context for the book in which my position in the world is implicated or exposed. I’m of course against imperialism, robbing people of their land and livelihoods, drone warfare, and any sort of institutionalized violence, but imperialism is in the cereal I eat and the culture I consume, and the ghost of Manifest Destiny looms large in the histories of the states I’ve spent most of my life in Texas, Oregon, Washington, and California. I hadn’t thought about the imperial measurement system until you mentioned it, and I like thinking of the force and mass of nostalgia. The nostalgia I want to come through in the collection itself is quite different than the one evoked by the title, and could perhaps be described as the measure between volition and the present moment. I could describe it as nostalgia for the now—a sense that what’s going on is lost in the happening.

SDS: There is something about your eponymous poem that brings much excitement and much grief. It reverses time and entangles space in a concise, almost scientific way. I wonder if the poet is in conversation with an earlier speaker who asks whether “travel is an enemy to ends.”

JE: I think all the poems emanate from the same speaker, but one who is in different (non-hierarchical) stages or states of being. This is probably the poem that is the most political in that section in some ways, and the "Departures" poems were written while reading a bit of cultural criticism, so there's definitely a link there.

SDS: The arrangement of poems in Imperial Nostalgias is thoughtful and elegant. There are five parts, which I’ve identified in this way: Parable, Lacunae (silence), a Reverie in sestets, a Chorus of forms (sound), and 31 Micrograms. How did you come to organize the book as you have? Assuming there is a story you tell yourself when you write, how does this storytelling help or complicate the way you structured this book?

JE: The sections were each written during very different times in my life, in different places, and the story I told myself came in the selection of the work instead of its writing. Although I often use aphoristic and declarative language, I’m more interested in uneasiness than resolve, so I wanted to convey a sense of a consciousness coming apart while being reformed, opening up as it becomes more focused.  The poems aren’t arranged chronologically, but I did want to create the texture of time’s passage.

SDS: I’m impressed by images in your poems that are both visceral and figurative. For instance, the smell of an “approaching language frontier”; a ceiling fan that “helps heighten the hotel’s diction”; time being “something that leaks from lungs”; a speaker needing to “dislodge the extra voice caught in my throat”; and an outsider who “stuck the real up into the imaginary.” It seems that you allow tandem realities –– sensational and imaginal –– to compatibly occupy a phrase, which in turn offered the chance for me to practice playing around in two worlds at once. 

JE: I hadn't really thought of that, but thanks for pointing it out! I'm guessing it has something to do with my interest in photography and poetry, how they interact in matters of truth and imagination.

SDS: In the section called Two Parables, the man in “The Traveler” and the man in “The Outsider” possess essential but opposite attitudes: sacred & secular, wise man & trickster, pedagogue & performer. Each man draws a crowd to his specialty; each awakens the crowd differently. In what ways do these parables act, throughout your book, as a reader’s travel guides?

JE: I guess the figures in those poems are meant as guides through the book, but I’m not sure I know how they work. Even if I did, it might be better for me to allow them to exist in their ambiguity.

SDS: “Valley of Unrest” is a series of photographs that follows the parables. I think it’s interesting that we traverse these images, allowing for sudden, silent time to look around before arriving at the first poems in “Departures”. What was behind your decision to place this valley, just so?  What are the challenges or what kind of time do you imagine the reader experiences? Are they meant as preparation for or as a kind of mnemonic for poems encountered later? In one poem, you write: “images are more demanding than ideas.” Since you worked extensively with photographs in your earlier book, Campeche, I’m hoping you can describe some of these demands or challenges.

JE: I take photographs to apprehend lyrical moments. I photograph things that move me, or I take a photograph when I want to remember a moment in time or record an image for further meditation and inspection. I wanted “Valley of Unrest” near the beginning of the book to put the reader in the role of a watcher. When I wrote “Departures,” I was sitting in trains, looking out windows, so having the photographs immediately before that section may help recreate that way of seeing. Some things resonate between the images in the collection but there’s no narrative to search for (except for the implication of an ending with the last image), and I wanted to establish this paradigm. Besides all this, my dad (with whom I collaborated on my first book) and several of my good friends are photographers. I’ve learned a lot from them about vision and accumulated meaning.

SDS: Ideas, images, and tightly wound theories are held to place by the reliability of the sestet form in “Departures”. There’s a noise of regularity –– train wheels on tracks –– that is comforting and, because of that, develops awareness of your language of motion, as if your words travel in their own poetic textures.

JE: I really love traveling by train, and at that point in my life I found journeys to be comforting partly because the confusion I found in the world –– which became more apparent in new surroundings while having a traveler's mindset –– seemed to dwarf my own.

SDS: I’m curious what you would answer to the question you ask in one of Departure’s sestets: “What are poets to do with the silence they put their poems into?”

JE: I don’t know, but maybe once the silence is gone it’ll be time to stop writing.

SDS: An emotional fatigue travels through some of these poems. Their tones or atonality are charged with a kind of unction and spiritual significance, like “a journey between exhaustion and joy”. Often, emotions “arise between a verb and its object,” as if sadness, bitterness, and attacks of love exist in a transitional space between the environment and the individual; as if emotions are indigenous to specific sites, and thus discoverable and borrowable. One example might be this stanza:

“I have formulated a new type of / resistance, against my own ignorance: / I transplant my mind a few times a day, / replacing it with unreliable / algorithms aimed at solving problems, / known as poems. I call them departures.” 

JE: I wish I had time to look up some psychoanalytic stuff about the totem to address this idea of emotions as indigenous to specific sites, but as you know I'm on the road again tomorrow. I pick up pretty strong vibes from places, or else I project my own anxieties and such onto places, and that transitional space of which you write does often feel very real. To me, it seems even more present between language and the self, than between the environment and the self. At times, a poem arrives when language pushes back against the self, and this happens a lot for me in environments.

SDS: Throughout Imperial Nostalgias the poet chronicles or is accompanied by crowds –– obedient crowds that listen, rebellious crowds that don’t hear, “crowds trapped in margins of stale air,” crowds made up of Beat poets, ancient and modern philosophers, a bunch of sightseers, ghosts and workers, notable photographers and visual artists. These crowds seem to have a vital, psychological function in relationship to the individual. You seem to be saying that the individual requires the crowd to make sense of himself?

JE: Community is something I think about a lot, and I’m glad you pointed out the crowds in the book because I hadn’t realized they were so prevalent. I recall the first time I was in a mosh pit, as a sophomore in high school…I was a really small kid, and I got slammed around really, but I enjoyed it a lot and it changed my thoughts about music, which until then had been a rather private joy in my life. It’s baffling to think of the powers at work in a violent mob or a bhikkhu-sangha joined in meditation.

SDS: On a more personal note I’m wondering what you’re doing these days? I know you’ve been involved with translating and teaching, that you’re the director and co-editor of Canarium books, and you’ve been living in Germany. Please talk about any of these things that seem relevant or of note.

JE: Since October, Lynn and I have lived near Stuttgart at the Akademie Schloss Solitude, an
amazing interdisciplinary residency where I’m on a yearlong fellowship. Our apartment is in an 18th Century palace that’s surrounded by forest, up on a hill, and we don’t go to the city much. Most of our time is spent at a shared desk, or else walking in the woods or hanging out with friends. I feel extremely fortunate to take part in the academy’s international community of artists and thinkers. Besides learning a lot, I’ve had the opportunity to collaborate with several friends I’ve met here: composer Peter Jakober, architect/artist Alan Worn, and artist Charlotte Moth. The past few months, I’ve also been working on the upcoming Canarium Books collections, freelance jobs, and my next book, Agonistes. After we leave Europe in December or January, Lynn and I will settle (at least half-time) in Marfa, Texas. We’re working on the design of our home with a friend and my dad, and we’ll build it from the ground up with the help of family and friends.


Sheila Davies Sumner has an M.F.A. in Poetry from St. Mary’s College of California. She has also written short stories which appeared in Rampike, Alcatraz 3, and in the graphic-story magazine, one of one, published by Burning Books. In addition, she has written and produced radio dramas, commissioned by New American Radio, including What is the Matter in Amy Glennon, which was nominated for the International Prix Futura Award.

 
Joshua Edwards directs and co-edits Canarium Books. He's the author of Imperial Nostalgias (Ugly Duckling, 2013) and Campeche (Noemi, 2011) and the translator of Mexican poet María Baranda's Ficticia (Shearsman, 2010). Currently a fellow at the Akademie Schloss Solitude, he divides his time between Stuttgart, Germany and Marfa, Texas.